12 Mar 2016 21:13:29
Sixers / Lakers

If Sixers get #1 and Lakers get #2.

Sixers get: #2 (Ingram), and Russell

Lakers get : #1 (Simmons), and there own #1 back next year (1-3 protected next year, unprotected the following year) .

Sixers / Suns

Sixers get: Bledsoe

Suns get: Noel, Miami #1

G: Bledsoe
G: Russell
F: Ingram
F: okafor
C: Embiid.

1.) 12 Mar 2016
12 Mar 2016 22:00:50
Lakers say no. Pretty sure Suns decline as well.

2.) 13 Mar 2016
13 Mar 2016 03:06:29
makes sense to me. I highly dought the laker get rid of Russel but the deal is close to fair value. Getting the lakers pick back is a solid deal. Especially if the pick covey this year.

3.) 13 Mar 2016
13 Mar 2016 14:34:53
Russell is worth more then 1st overall pick. He is going to be a top 5 player. A rich man's Harden.

4.) 13 Mar 2016
13 Mar 2016 15:39:28
Ben Simmons

That way way to early to say that. He was a bust for half the year. Lately he's improved which I am thrilled to see for la's sake. Still think la should taken okafor over him but i hate to see busts out of college so it's encouraging to see.

5.) 13 Mar 2016
13 Mar 2016 19:07:37
Haha your funny. Okafor is not worth Randle alone. Are u serious that they should've picked Okafor, i mean that is a seriously uneducated comment.

6.) 13 Mar 2016
13 Mar 2016 21:47:33
lakers don't trade Russell unless it's for a superstar.

7.) 14 Mar 2016
13 Mar 2016 23:13:10
Bensimmons, uneducated comment is the lakers don't trade Randle for okafor straight up. Please tell me how you can possibly think Randle is better.

Additionally, top 5? Guaranteed? Well, seeing as he will need to compete with, in their prime, curry, Leonard, Davis, towns, Wiggins, lillard. guaranteed top 5? Remind me again, which of those will he clearly be better than? Because it needs to be at least 2 of them. And then the rest of the league.

What a homer.