14 Mar 2016 20:17:47
PHI/ POR

Okafor for McCollum.

1.) 14 Mar 2016
14 Mar 2016 20:26:15
I hate this deal. I see why people would like it but McCollum is so overrated. He's had one good year and he's worth a top three pick? I don't see it.

2.) 14 Mar 2016
14 Mar 2016 21:19:05
He is worth Okafor but isn't that good. You can't just go buy picks since that was b4. Its like saying McCollum is not worth #1 pick in Bennett.

3.) 14 Mar 2016
14 Mar 2016 21:25:17
Yeah. Agreeing with Simmons. Okafor isn't worth a top 3. That's like saying no one can trade for Bennett. I mean he is a number 1.

4.) 14 Mar 2016
14 Mar 2016 21:32:30
Have you watched McCollum this year? His offensive game is great. I would say no from Portland. Okafor is the next Greg Monroe, he's destined to put up nice numbers on average to bad teams. McCollum could be a difference maker.

5.) 15 Mar 2016
14 Mar 2016 23:49:28
Wouldnt say McCollum will be difference maker, he can improve still, but not make such a leap; but I'd say he is a better player on off than Okafor at a moment; but the main difference is CJ plays position where defensive flaws are less impactful, and I think that's the main reason POR wouldn't do this.

6.) 15 Mar 2016
15 Mar 2016 14:07:11
Ben Simmons

What has Oakfor done that hasn't been as advertised? He can score at will and is a beast offensively. what number three pick this year is worth a top scoring center. The answer is none.

7.) 15 Mar 2016
15 Mar 2016 14:09:34
I can't see what you guys see in the McCollum kid. He's on a and team and putting up number just as Oakfor is. The difference is Oakfor is 20. And how has Oakfor not out performed the number three pick of a draft? He's better then what everyone thought and I wouldn't tkae anyone in this draft other then Ingram and Simmons over him and that frankly only due to the Sixers have a bunch of bigs already.