17 Jun 2017 00:13:46
Boston: K Love+ T Thompson+ 17 pick (Giles or Leaf)+ 2rnd pick Cleveland 2018

Cle: A Horford+ J Parker+ Bradley+ Middleton

Bucks: Zeller+JR Smith+ Shumpert+ 1rst pick

Boston signs G Hayward

C: Thompson/ Zigic
PF: K Love/ Giles
SF: Crowder/ J Brown
SG: Hayward/ Smart
PG: IT/ Rozier

Cleveland:
C: Horford
PF: LBJ
SF: J Parker
SG: Bradley
PG: Irving
Sixth: Middleton

Bucks
C:Henson
PF: T Maker
SF:Giannis
SG:Beasly/Vaughn
PG: Fultz


1.) 17 Jun 2017
17 Jun 2017 01:12:03
Not bad for Boston in the Cavs, but I'm not sure why the Bucks do it.


2.) 17 Jun 2017
17 Jun 2017 02:30:04
Bucks say no not receiving enough in return at all.


3.) 17 Jun 2017
17 Jun 2017 03:05:55
Why would the bucks or boston do this?


4.) 17 Jun 2017
17 Jun 2017 03:45:32
Why is everyone trying to dump their crap players on the Bucks? Zeller? j. R. Smith, Shumpert? AND the 1st rd. pick? And give up Middleton a starter, J. Parker A starter when healthy, and the 17th pick? Milwaukee already has, Brogdan, Dellededova, Gary Payton ll, and J. Terry for PG's. No need for Fultz. I believe Milwaukee would pass.


5.) 17 Jun 2017
17 Jun 2017 03:49:30
this is bad for the bucks. they should keep middleton and receive horford or bradley instead. and the cavs should get zeller since they would be thin at center.


6.) 17 Jun 2017
17 Jun 2017 04:18:26
Again, Milwaukee says No, No matter how many times you try and restate it. , Milwaukee doesn't need a PG, (Brogdan, Delladedova, Gary Payton ll J Terry, are all PG's) Zeller, Smith, and Shupert, are all scrubs! Why would the Bucks give up starters Middleton, and Middleton and the 17th pick for them?


7.) 17 Jun 2017
17 Jun 2017 04:38:13
I feel your pain, Cavs fan. But no.


8.) 17 Jun 2017
17 Jun 2017 06:21:10
Boston wouldn't do this. They don't want Love or TT. Horford is good for their system and they definitely don't want the Kardashian Kurse. Bronnie wanted Love and TT and now he got them until he bolts after next. James isn't to hard to figure out.


9.) 17 Jun 2017
17 Jun 2017 10:28:04
K Love would be the second scoring option in Boston, so i think he would be great again.
Both TT and Love are good rebounders and Boston need A defender, so TT would be usefull and on a reasonable contract for them.
Giving up Bradley is hard for them, but he's going for a big contract next year and they need to clear cap, so they can sign Hayward.

I like this trade for Milwaukee.
J Parker is a great player, but he's not a great fit in that team and he is injury-prone, so he's a risk.
I think the combo Giannis-Fultz will be unstopable in a few years, so i would take those bad contracts.
And Shumpert isn't a bad player. And Zeller's contract isn't guaranteed, so they can cut him after the trade.


10.) 17 Jun 2017
17 Jun 2017 11:25:26
Why would the Bucks want Fultz? They currently have Brogdan, Delldedova, G. Payton ll, and j. Terry, Plus Giannis A. ALL play PG's? The Bucks say NO AGAIN!


11.) 18 Jun 2017
18 Jun 2017 00:29:24
I don't see the Bucks doing it but for the Cavs and Celtics they are great moves. Cleveland adds a good replacement in Love with Horford plus gets younger and more talented youth with Parker and Middleton. Bradleys just a born winning and is underrated in my opinion. Boston just has so much to work with, this is just one angle they can go with this.


12.) 19 Jun 2017
19 Jun 2017 07:12:21
No fron Bucks