11 May 2019 18:37:49
Rockets send Chris Paul
Celtics send Gordon Hayward

The Celtics get a very good PG to replace Kyrie and one that’s much more focused on distribution to develop Tatum and others. The Rockets don’t need said PG with Harden being the true lead guard, but could use a playmaking wing that can shoot and play D. The contracts are both famously bad but about even due to that while Paul’s is a year longer, you more likely know what you’re getting from him as Hayward is much more of a mystery.

1.) 11 May 2019
11 May 2019 18:55:19
Hayward isn't good anymore. Would be bad for the Rockets.

2.) 12 May 2019
11 May 2019 21:45:51
I'm not sure what defense you get out ofHayward, makes sense from C pov if irving leaves,

3.) 12 May 2019
11 May 2019 22:24:42
Cp3 is expensive and not good anymore wouldn't he good.

4.) 12 May 2019
11 May 2019 22:50:31
You think it’s like the cinematic masterpiece “Rookie of the Year”? Just, poof?

5.) 13 May 2019
13 May 2019 15:47:12
That's actually a really good fit for both clubs, but I don't think that CP3 has shown quite the regression and Hayward hasn't quite shown the improvement to merit the swap.

Plus, do the State Farm commercials now wind up including Tatum/ Horford? How is that going to work? And the color scheme worked with the Clippers and Rockets, but that red and green don't work as well. Does State Farm stay with the Rockets and switch to Harden? These are the real questions we need answers to.