NBA Trade Rumors Member Posts

 

scubapro's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded


scubapro's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To scubapro's Posts

 

 

To scubapro's last 5 rumour replies

 

scubapro has no Rumours Posts

 

 

scubapro has no Banter Posts

 

 

scubapro's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

18 Jun 2016 08:05:09
Both are very unrealistic.

Sixers have no need for Lou Williams. The Lakers are getting waaaayyy to much in this trade.

Second trade: why would Cavs trade Irving?

scubapro

 

 

Click To View This Thread

18 Jun 2016 08:01:12
No way the sixers would have to give up Okafor Plus the 2017 1st round pick. If they want Okafor it would be a straight swap, maybe even Lakers throwing in someone. Brandon Ingram who will be picked #2 is a multi-year project. He has a lot of potential, but is a big project and depends on him putting on weight/ muscle which will not happen overnight. Okafor is proven low post scorer which is something the lakers desperately need. Also, Lakers owner Buss needs to win now, not 4yrs from now to prevent his sister from taking over the team.

scubapro

 

 

Click To View This Thread

18 Jun 2016 07:57:08
More realistic would be Sixers get #5 and Brandon Knight or Bledsoe (#13 is not enough) . To get #5 sixers may need to include a player such as Hollis Thompson or Kendall Marshall.

scubapro

 

 

Click To View This Thread

18 Jun 2016 07:53:12
The Sixers - Celtics part of the trade is realistic, however the Sixers - Lakers part of the trade is very one-sided. You must be a Lakers fan. First of all, the sixers won't be trading Noel, and second, giving #3, 24 and 26 Plus Noel is way too much for the #2 pick. You are obviously including Nick Young to get rid of him, but the sixers will want nothing to do with him.

scubapro

 

 

 

scubapro has no Banter Replies