08 Feb 2016 23:10:39
LAkers and BUCKS

Russell and Hibbert for moose and mcw.

1.) 09 Feb 2016
09 Feb 2016 03:38:20
So basically it's Monroe for Russell? That's rather awful for the lakers, no?

2.) 09 Feb 2016
09 Feb 2016 14:22:01
Lakers over value russel. But this trade makes some sense. Monroe is a bust for the bucks as is mcw.

Bucks might try to retool by getting russel instead.

3.) 09 Feb 2016
09 Feb 2016 17:12:10
As a Bucks fan I would freaking love this. Basically moose for the number two overall pick. That's almost the same as the trade people are saying no way with the celtics. Moose for their Brooklyn pick.

4.) 09 Feb 2016
09 Feb 2016 21:31:47
I like this trade