17 Dec 2016 14:53:20
Lakers/ Pacers

Lakers Trade: Ingram, Clarkson, and Nance
Pacers trade: Paul George.

1.) 17 Dec 2016
17 Dec 2016 15:53:25
Try ingram Randel and clarkson. That closer and still might not be enough.

2.) 17 Dec 2016
17 Dec 2016 16:02:25
I agree with TreGib. I don't think this is anywhere close to the value of Paul George.

3.) 17 Dec 2016
17 Dec 2016 16:02:47
No deal from lakers we need young players to grow even though I like George.

4.) 17 Dec 2016
17 Dec 2016 16:37:29
We would want Ingram and Russell, Not Clarckson.

Bu.

5.) 17 Dec 2016
17 Dec 2016 17:12:13
For me it would have to be Ingram, Clarkson, and Randle. I'm not trading Russell as I see him as a future superstar and the face of our franchise ❄️.

6.) 17 Dec 2016
17 Dec 2016 18:23:31
I agree with Daniel

You don't trade Russel at this point. Ingram is expendable as he looks like a project player right now. Defiantely has upside so his value should be high as of now. Him with clarkson and Randel who are nice players should be at least interesting to the pacers.

7.) 22 Dec 2016
22 Dec 2016 14:57:42
I actually grew up being a lakers n pacers fan, so I know both teams well. 1st off pacers aren't trading George unless he asks to be traded or hints at leaving for free agency. So if that happened the pacers would definitely want ingram, russell, n nance. But LA would be dumb to do that. I think the future is really bright for Russell. Superstar in the making. So pacers would look elsewhere n la would look for someone else to trade if it involved Randle n clarkson. I say keep Russell n ingram.