06 Jan 2017 13:31:38
Philly-LA-NO


NO
receive: LA pick+ Noel
trade: B Hield

LA:
receive: philly pick+ Sac pick 19+Saric
trade: Russell+ Ingram

Philly
receive: Russell+ Ingram+ Hield
trade:philly pick+LA Pick+ Sac 19 pick+ Saric


Philly
C: Embiid
PF: Simmons
SF: Ingram
SG: B Hield
PG: Russell


1.) 06 Jan 2017
06 Jan 2017 14:04:25
No way Lakers do this. DeAngelo and Ingram are the future there.


2.) 06 Jan 2017
06 Jan 2017 14:05:44
beyond laughable. come on. sixers aren't getting near that return. so the lakers pick is likely mid lottery, 7-10 range. Sac pic, no one knows. Saric is a role player. Only thing of real value is the philly pick, but somehow they get 3 players that are top 6 picks?

just stop


3.) 06 Jan 2017
06 Jan 2017 14:38:11
So the Lakers trade two top 2 picks for future picks? Why would they do that? They're building around Russell and Ingram.


4.) 06 Jan 2017
06 Jan 2017 16:22:08
LA could fall into the top three afther trading Russel and Ingram
So they keep their pick and the pick they owned Orlando will change into two second round picks.
They could draft J Jackson and Fulz if that happens.

And the Sacramento pick will be great

Saric will be more than a roll player in a few years.


5.) 06 Jan 2017
06 Jan 2017 21:12:49
Hield has picked it up recently but If I was Nola I would quickly that offer for Hield. Noel and Davis (which could've been a thing originally but they traded him for Jrue Holiday) would be a dynamic duo. Another injured guy isn't what Nola needs (76ers screwed them over with that in Holiday trade) but I like the upside in adding a solid defensive bigman and the Lakers pick (right now would be #7) for one guy in Hield who is older than Noel. Nola would have their own pick too so they would have interesting options (could add a pg and Tatum or trade either for a more established player) .

On sixers side a good argument could be made as to why they should just keep the pick and find another deal for Okafor or Noel.

I don't like Lakers part. Nobody likes rebuilding so I don't think Lakers deal away the promising young guys they have just to get new promising young guys. Saric isn't on their level and Sac pick is two years away.


6.) 06 Jan 2017
06 Jan 2017 21:53:00
I think that package for la could get a star player. If I was them I'd go the star player instead. Or possibly just stand pat and let the young guys develope.