Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
No Avatar image uploaded
NBA Trade Rumors Member Posts
Adamsmith's Profile
Adamsmith's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Adamsmith's Posts
To Adamsmith's last 5 rumours posts
To Adamsmith's last 5 banter posts
To Adamsmith's last 5 rumour replies
Adamsmith's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Adamsmith's rumours posts
23 Jan 2016 19:13:09
Lakers: Love, Shump, Kyrie
LeCavs: DRuss, Randle and 2016 pick if it's #2-3.
1.) 23 Jan 2016 19:54:38
Insane trade for Cavs.
2.) 23 Jan 2016 20:28:51
Throw Lebron in the deal while your at it.
3.) 23 Jan 2016 20:42:40
Kyrie is worth more.
4.) 23 Jan 2016 23:50:01
Who are the 2 people that agreed to this trade? Laker fans I assume.
5.) 23 Jan 2016 23:58:03
Take out Russell and Irving and the value is probably pretty close. The problem is that Cleveland isn't waiting on two young guys to develop, they need to win now. If they wanted to watch guys develop, they'd have Wiggins instead of love right now.
6.) 24 Jan 2016 00:16:06
Insane trade for Lakers!
The future is bright with Dlo, Randle and Ingram/ Simmons don't mess it up LA.
Patience is a virtue.
7.) 24 Jan 2016 00:43:17
Neither team would dish out these players.
8.) 24 Jan 2016 03:24:45
Kyrie and Love might be hall of famers when it's all said and done and are just now entering their primes. You are saying the lakers shouldn't trade Russell and Randle? that's hysterical.
05 Jan 2016 05:24:03
Lakers: Kyrie, Shump
Cave: D'Angelo, Randle.
1.) 05 Jan 2016 05:34:23
Cavs say no chance. They aren't trading their young stud point guard when their trying to compete for prospects.
2.) 05 Jan 2016 05:49:57
Well we all know it's whatever Lebron wants. Plus, once Lebron leaves what will Cleveland have? NADA.
3.) 05 Jan 2016 08:28:03
Adamsmith, no need to try to argue your point, the trade is just trash and I'm not even talking about how there is no way possible the trade is even possible.
4.) 05 Jan 2016 15:09:52
Ah yes, good point Adamsmith. Forgot to think about all the speculation on LeBron James leaving his hometown team for a second time. Clearly you are ahead of the game there. Well played.
5.) 05 Jan 2016 14:49:37
That is true but lebron will be staying there for at least 5 years.
05 Jan 2016 02:23:48
Lakers: McDermott, Mirotic
Bulls: Randle and Young.
1.) 05 Jan 2016 05:57:06
Bulls say no, they need a 3 and with Doug gone they have just another big.
02 Jan 2016 01:59:33
Clipps: Trevor Ariza, D12, Lawson
Houston: Ricky Rubio, DAndre Jordan
Wolves: Chris Paul.
1.) 02 Jan 2016 03:52:49
Wolves need to give more. Clips say no. They would rather have paul them Lawson and Ariza. Deandre is locked up, younger, and isn't as much selfish as Dwight.
2.) 02 Jan 2016 04:02:49
Clippers say no.
3.) 02 Jan 2016 04:20:09
Clippers get jaaaaaaacked. Maybe if this was 10 years ago and they were trying to lose. But no chance they do that nonsense.
4.) 02 Jan 2016 04:56:08
Whaaaaat.
5.) 02 Jan 2016 05:42:07
Clips are getting robbed blind. Horrible trade for la.
6.) 02 Jan 2016 06:04:52
Houston getting ripped.
7.) 02 Jan 2016 06:20:07
Makes no sense for any of the teams. Clippers will never trade CP3 or DAndre. Lawson is a terrible replacement for CP3. And Ricky can't shoot so he will be a liability for Houston that is already struggling.
8.) 02 Jan 2016 19:53:41
If the Clippers still had Olshey, the would have won at least one ring by now. But with super overrated Doc Rivers, anything is possible.
01 Jan 2016 22:12:42
If lakers get the 1st or 2nd pick.
sac: DRuss, Clarkson, Randle
was: Cousins
la: Wall
Sign and trade pick to Okc for KD.
1.) 01 Jan 2016 23:04:21
Wizards rather have Wall plus he isn't a troublemaker like cousins. Also even if it's the first pick, Simmons alone isn't enough for KD. It took the Cavs Wiggins and Bennett plus some to get Love and KD is way better than Love.
2.) 01 Jan 2016 23:32:16
Why would wizard get kd without wall? Just a bad team with kd then?
3.) 02 Jan 2016 00:51:08
Wasnt kevin love simply a trade, not a sign and trade?
4.) 02 Jan 2016 00:53:23
I would think if OKC scenes KD is going to dip, they would take that trade all day.
5.) 02 Jan 2016 01:42:51
K Love trade was simply a trade technically and philly was involved so the salaries worked that way with Phillys help. Sign and trade KD for just the first pick I wouldn't believe it would work. More would have to be added contract wise. Example KD I bet will sign for at least 25 mil a year so to match the difference of 5.5 mil for the first pick Hibbert, Lou Williams and Young plus the first maybe would work for KD.
6.) 02 Jan 2016 01:50:23
Yea I think you're right about the love/ wiggins
Trade. However, what I don't recall is if Love and KD where in the same contractual situation.
7.) 02 Jan 2016 01:55:15
In addition, if the Lakers did get the 1st pick, Simmons' upside is higher than Wiggins', and that's saying a lot.
8.) 02 Jan 2016 01:59:56
The lakers are projected to have around 65 million in salary cap this offseason so the sign and trade for durants max contract wouldn't be a problem. The love trade was not a sign and trade but it basically was as love resigned with the cavs.
9.) 02 Jan 2016 04:22:01
The point was you can't analyze the two trades and values of return. A trade warrants relatively equal benefits. A sign and trade is just trying to get whatever you can by allowing for a longer contract. The 1st overall would be more than enough.
Adamsmith's banter posts with other poster's replies to Adamsmith's banter posts
29 Apr 2016 20:37:21
Lakers: John Wall, KD, Moose
Washington: Parker, DAngelo
Thunder: Julius Randle, 2016 Draft pick (LAL)
Bucks: Brad Beal, Cameron Payne
Bucks: Payne, Beal, Middleton, Giannis, Henson
Lakers: Wall, Clarkson, KD, Nance, Moose
Was: DAngelo, Porter, Parker, Nene, Gortat
Thun: Westbrook, Roberson, Ingram, Randle, Iblaka.
1.) 29 Apr 2016 23:22:42
Why the he'll would wizards do this? Also 2 free agents are in this trade.
2.) 30 Apr 2016 14:02:48
This is just embarrasing.
3.) 30 Apr 2016 18:51:38
Come on bro, you can do better then this.
18 Dec 2015 02:20:54
What can LA get for Clarkson? Any thoughts?
1.) 18 Dec 2015 06:10:30
Why do you want to trade him? I'm not calling him untradeable but is because you think he will leave in free agency? He is a restricted free agent so we can match any offer he gets.
10 Dec 2015 00:45:48
Phila: Russell and Randle
Sacramento: Okafor, Lou Williams
Lakers: Westbrook and Batum
Hornets: Joel Embiid
Okc: Cousins, Ben Maclemore
Lakers: Westbrook, Clarkson, Batum, Nance, Hibbert
Phila: Russell, Stauskas, Covington, Randle, Noel
Sac: Rondo, Lou Will, Gay, Oak, C-Stein
Hornets: Lin, Kemba, MKG, Kaminski, Embiid
Okc: Payne, Ben Mac, KD, Ibaka, Cousins.
1.) 10 Dec 2015 14:55:37
Oak for and the hurt embiid gets the sixers Randle and Russell? No way.
2.) 11 Dec 2015 13:57:49
Sixers don't want that either. Potential of what they give up far surpasses what they get. Why not just wait and bet in embiid. He is worlds better than Randle if healthy. Might as well roll the dice on it.
08 Jan 2016 02:56:26
Makes the wolves go.? Go to the draft lottery you mean. Rubio is a back up at best.
05 Jan 2016 05:49:57
Well we all know it's whatever Lebron wants. Plus, once Lebron leaves what will Cleveland have? NADA.
05 Jan 2016 04:07:42
as I lakers fan I agree they're pretty bad, however, LA has brought 5 rings in the last 15 years so we're pretty spoiled. I'm sure they'll snatch up top tier talent form other teams like they have in the past and will back in the finals shortly.
02 Jan 2016 19:53:41
If the Clippers still had Olshey, the would have won at least one ring by now. But with super overrated Doc Rivers, anything is possible.
02 Jan 2016 01:55:15
In addition, if the Lakers did get the 1st pick, Simmons' upside is higher than Wiggins', and that's saying a lot.
Adamsmith has no Banter Replies