NBA Trade Rumors Member Posts


Bmiller66's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



Bmiller66's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Bmiller66's Posts



To Bmiller66's last 5 rumours posts


To Bmiller66's last 5 rumour replies


Bmiller66's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Bmiller66's rumours posts


02 Jun 2017 17:15:11
Blazers trade:
Moe Harkless
Pick #20

Knicks trade:
Willy Hernangomez.


1.) 02 Jun 2017 17:58:07
Don't think Hernangomez is worth this much and although Blazers need cap relief Harkless' contract isn't that bad (also Blazers don't really need a center) .

2.) 02 Jun 2017 18:32:17
The blazers desperately need a backup center Jaw.

I do agree it's a bit of an overpay by Portland, but it does cut salary and bring a decent young player back. If they could then unload Meyers Leonard, they'd be out of luxury tax for one year.

3.) 03 Jun 2017 00:00:10
Problem is that Harkless is not a true salary dump. His salary is moderate and at 24 years old he has big upside value. Portland needs to dump Turner, Leonard, and Crabbe in that order of horrible value contracts. Portland needs an impact 3/ 4 before they need a back up center. This deal doesn't address either.



15 Feb 2017 20:20:42
Blazers receive Drummond

Pistons receive McCollum, Stauskas, and Portland's 2017 first (top 5 protected)

76ers receive Crabbe and Memphis 2017 first (from Portland)

Blazers get a star big.
Detroit gets a solid return for Drummond. McCollum can play beside Jackson, or they can look to move Jackson.
Phili gets a shooter that they need and a first for basically nothing but the use of cap room.


1.) 15 Feb 2017 20:29:57
How does Philly get Crabbe and a 1st rd pick for Stauskus?

2.) 15 Feb 2017 20:35:53
It's basically a salary dump by Portland NewLakerDynasty. With McCollum's extension, the contracts are hard to line up. He counts as 20 million to Detroit, but only 3 million for Portland.

You could certainly take the first out and I think it would be fair as well, I just didn't want to hear TreGib complain about crabbe again.

3.) 15 Feb 2017 21:11:15
Haha, DET agrees to this in record setting speed.

4.) 15 Feb 2017 22:53:13
I went back and forth on the picks quite a bit. Maybe an overpay for Portland, but they desperately need a real big.

Certainly a lot of variation you could do. Crabbe could be replaced with Meyers Leonard and Ezeli (who is non-guaranteed next year) . I might prefer that, because losing McCollum and Crabbe leaves a big hole in portlands wing shooting.

5.) 15 Feb 2017 23:38:26
Confused on how philly get crabbe and a first? Did you forget to include okafor to pistons?

6.) 15 Feb 2017 23:39:29
Philly doesn't need a shooter as bad as people think. 76ers have a couple good shooting forwards.

7.) 16 Feb 2017 01:12:37
Honestly I don't see Portland giving up McCollum and 1st's for a big until they see what they have in Nurkic. Also I hate seeing Crabbe to Philly. I'd rather stick with Stauskas. He's just as productive and cheaper. Crabbe is a bench player making starter money. That just handcuff's the Philly rebuild. Hate this trade.



16 Jan 2017 03:51:52
Blazers trade:

Mo Harkless
Ed Davis
Festus Ezeli
Portland's 2017 first, top 5 protected

Nets trade:

Brook Lopez
Joe Harris
Quincy Acy
(Or replace those two for someone else wth a small contract)


1.) 16 Jan 2017 13:53:05
Nets don't get enough. Someone has to give up at least one quality young asset. Harkless is simply not enough. And the first too late to be impactful.



02 Jan 2017 18:35:22
Damian Lillard for Paul George

It wouldn't happen, teams don't swap stars often, but there's some sense there. Portland balances their roster. Indy moves a star that's getting a bit disgruntled for one locked in a bit longer.


1.) 02 Jan 2017 20:12:25
No there's no sense, Portland wouldn't have a point guard.

2.) 02 Jan 2017 20:37:31
McCollum is a point guard. He's started there every game Lillard has missed the last two years. Just because he starts at SG doesn't mean he's not a more natural point.

3.) 03 Jan 2017 01:05:50
Value wise okay I can see it. But why on earth would that happen.




Bmiller66 has no Talk Posts



Bmiller66's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

16 Mar 2018 16:37:43
This trade also assumes Nurkic walks. I wouldn’t give up Nurkic, Collins, swanigan, and picks for gasol (who seems like he’s fading) .

I’d rather just move picks and swanigan to dump Turner (if they need, it would more likely be Leonard they’d try to dump) .




Click To View This Thread

15 Mar 2018 17:11:51
Portland gets considerably worse, and doesn’t help their cap situation. I don’t see any way that makes sense for them.

I don’t understand why Brooklyn would be involved at all. Why not just take Teague and the pick over Carrol?




Click To View This Thread

15 Mar 2018 13:13:03
There’s too much depth at the top of the draft to trade up from 4 to 1. I just don’t see a reason for Phoenix to give away Jackson.




Click To View This Thread

14 Mar 2018 20:44:10
If Lebron decided to go to the Nets, these moves make some sense. If not, these moves give them a chance to make the playoffs at best.




Click To View This Thread

13 Mar 2018 19:33:43
Considering the cap space available this offseason, I wouldn’t be shocked if Napier and Davis were in Portland next year. Role players aren’t going to get much.

Trading superstars locked in long term is rarely a good idea, especially for small market teams. And even more importantly when the guy is happy to be there (as Lillard is from Oakland, not Ohio, so he’s fairly close to home)

NO shouldn’t trade Davis, the Bucks shouldn’t trade Giannis, and Portland shouldn’t trade Lillard. Because best case scenario if they trade them is that they get a player that is similarly talented. Worst case scenario, you spend 5-10 years in Phoenix level rebuilding hell.





Bmiller66 has no Talk Replies