NBA Trade Rumors Member Posts

 

Jvoug1's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




Jvoug1's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Jvoug1's Posts

 

 

To Jvoug1's last 5 rumours posts

 

To Jvoug1's last 5 talk posts

 

To Jvoug1's last 5 rumour replies

 

To Jvoug1's last 5 talk replies

 

Jvoug1's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Jvoug1's rumours posts

 

13 Apr 2018 14:31:41
Sixers/Bulls

Sixers get: future highly protected 2nd
Bulls get: Bayless (1yr left at 9mill), and sixers own 2018 #1(pick 26).

Sixers clear 9 more million in cap room, allow them to go after LBJ.

Bulls gain another first round pick for their rebuild. Only on the hook for 1 year with bayless. Win/Win trade.
Sixers are on an amazing run, and to think they are the #3 seed and winners of 52 games was not even in anyones mind at the beginning of the season. Saying this, I am a firm believer that adding arguably the best player on the planet to ANY team will be a good thing. They will make the fit work with Simmons and LBJ. This is what "The Process" was all about. Getting the top picks, hoping one or two become all stars, and then being able to attract free agents.

Jvoug1

1.) 13 Apr 2018 14:48:58
Bulls could then try to flip that plus pels pick and Bobby Portis for a teen pick 12-16?


2.) 13 Apr 2018 14:50:55
This is reasonable, and continues to be a trend in the NBA. The fact that the Bulls only have to take on one year of Bayless, while teams like the Nets are taking on multi year deals is a win for them. Philly already has another 1st in the draft, so losing the least favourable one is no big deal.


3.) 13 Apr 2018 14:56:03
Could probably get a 2nd for him outright. Expiring deal has some value.


4.) 13 Apr 2018 15:05:12
The 5 year 'Process" top draft picks:

2013: #6 Nerlens Noel-failure, #11 MCW (turned into #10 pick this year from Lakers) -To be determind
2014: #3 Joel Embiid-Success, #12 Dario Saric-Success
2015: #3 Jahlil Okafor-Failure
2016: #1 Ben Simmons-Success
2017: #1 Markelle Fultz-To be determind

The fortunate thing about "the process' is it produced two top NBA talents, gave the team an identity and togetherness, made the sixers an actual destination that free agaents may be attracted too, and left the Sixers with huge cap room to possibly get another top player.


5.) 13 Apr 2018 15:26:02
If PHI gets to the Conference championship, or better, free agents will be there.


6.) 13 Apr 2018 22:03:05
Expiring contracts only have value if you trade a longer term contract for it. They won’t get a second straight up for it. A team isn’t going well we want to spend 9 million for no reason. I mean. It’s expiring so yay.


7.) 14 Apr 2018 13:09:44
I'm going well, I mean, so yay! Every GM is an adolescent girl?


 

 

03 Apr 2018 19:56:41
Sixers/Bulls

Sixers get: Bulls pick #8
Bulls get: Lakers pick #10 and Sixers pick #24, knicks pick #39

Sixers move up 2 spots to grab Carter, Bridges, or Porter(if he falls due to injury).
Bulls move down 2 spots but gain another #1 pick and a high 2nd rd pick.

Jvoug1

1.) 03 Apr 2018 20:24:31
Why would bulls do this they need help more at sf Philly already has ROCO bulls if asked trade that pick for Robert Covington bulls have bunch of cap.


2.) 03 Apr 2018 23:34:51
I think this all depends on who Chicago is targeting. If they're higher on a guys like Miles Bridges or Knox than Sexton, young, Carter or Mikal Bridges this may make sense.


 

 

25 Mar 2018 16:24:38
Sixers/Cavs

IF LBJ goes to Houston or La......

Sixers get: KLove
Cavs get: Lakers #1,Sixers #1 2018

Love is a perfect fit with Embiid and Simmons. He's 29, still has 3-4 prime years left, shoots 41% from deep and rebounds a a high rate. Plus, this allows Saric to be the 6th man a strengthen the Sixers weak bench tremendously.
Cavs get two more #1 picks to rebuild.

Jvoug1

1.) 25 Mar 2018 17:07:34
That'd be great for Cleveland, if Lebron leaves.


2.) 25 Mar 2018 18:43:13
I like it a lot for both sides. Love is a perfect third option and (as you said) fits the other two stars in Phili.


3.) 25 Mar 2018 18:49:56
rkenne16: Do you think Cavs would do it for the Lakers lottery pick only? It would unload $25mill from their payroll as well. Just a thought?


4.) 25 Mar 2018 19:23:44
Possibly, it would give them the ability to resign Hood and/ or a Lebron s and t without having to pay luxury tax. It's hard to tell what Love's trade value is. He's an allstar, but he will be 30 and he has obvious holes in his game.


5.) 26 Mar 2018 02:02:56
I really don't think the Sixers would do this. If they're going to get an older star to complement Embiid and Simmons, I believe they would get a guard. They already have Saric who plays a similar role to what Love does at a much lower price tag (obviously not as good) .


6.) 26 Mar 2018 15:18:14
Yeah. After posting this trade for just the laker pick for Love on a sixer site, I was slaughtered. I still think Love would improve the starting 5 and improve the bench (with saric moving to 6th man) . TTP.


7.) 26 Mar 2018 16:05:26
I think Bayless would have to involved from the Philly end. I don't think it's bad for Philly though. Adding Love, Simmons being atleast somewhat of a threat from 3, and a heathy Fultz could make Philly a realistic threat to win the East. They have the athleticism to cover for him (his defensive rebounding and post defense are both good, but he's bad in transition and he doesn't protect the rim) and his shooting could fill a big hole in their line up with Simmons not being able to shoot and real concerns about Fultz being able to shoot. He would bring experience from a player that actually contributes and could take a lot of pressure off of their young guys.


 

 

11 Mar 2018 17:52:47
76ers/Bulls

The Sixers currently hold pick #11,17,35,39,47,and 60.
The Bulls have picks #9 and 24 (Plus a ton of cap space no bigtime FA will take with a team beginning a total rebuild).

Sixers get: #9
Bulls get: #11,17,35,47,60 and bayless(has 1 year remaining at $9mill).
The #11 and #17 for the #9 seems fair. And 3 second rounders to take on one year of bayless seems more then fair, especially since Chicago has tons of cap space).
This gives the bulls 3 #1 picks and 3 second rd picks in the draft. Sixers get rid of byless's one year at 9 mill, freeing up more space to land a big fish(ie LBJ), plus draft Mikal Bridges out of Villanova at #9(who very likely would be there at #11 anyway).
Sixers 2018
C; Embiid,Holmes
Pf: Saric,Ilyosova,Bolden
SF: LBJ,Covington,Bridges
SG: Redick,Fultz,Bridges
PG: Simmons,Fultz,McConnel

Jvoug1

1.) 11 Mar 2018 17:57:30
If bulls pick falls in that 5-8 range, just have sixers sending #17 to bulls to take bayless, and leave out the 3 second rounders. That may actually make more sense and still have the desired results for both teams. I may have over complicated the trade in the original post.


2.) 11 Mar 2018 18:27:41
If Fultz can come in and be anything close to what he was suppose to be next year that team would be really good. Add in a player like Bridges, who you would hope can come in and be something similiar to Tatum this year and that team has a real chance at a title. The length and defense would be ridiculous and having Fultz and Saric to lead the bench unit could give them one of the better 2nd groups in the league. There are a lot of questions added to the ones above like Embiid's health and can Simmons develop enough of a 3 that he actually has to be respected, but the Rockets and Warriors would have to be legitimately concerned.


3.) 12 Mar 2018 00:21:23
Boston be Better choice then 76ers.


 

 

05 Jan 2018 21:09:03
76ers/Lakers

Sixers need some bench scoring and have cap space. Lakers need to unload salary

Sixers get: Jordan Clarkson
Lakers get: Amir Johnson

Sixers get a quality scorer off the bench. Sixers still have enough cap room to make a play at one max player in the off-season . Lakers cut 12.5 million in salary next year and 13.5 mill the following year. This helps Lakers in their pursuit of the FA big fishes. Win/Win???

Jvoug1

1.) 05 Jan 2018 21:11:17
Amir Johnson is an 11 million expiring contract. Clarkson makes 11.5 this year
Perfect salary match.


2.) 05 Jan 2018 21:15:39
I think you would have to throw in a protects future first for this to make sense for the Lakers.


3.) 05 Jan 2018 21:44:57
Rkenne: I think a future 2nd rounder will do it. Not going to tie up a future first time make this deal.


4.) 05 Jan 2018 23:48:03
I could see that over the summer if any of the Lebron etc. rumors come true (a 2nd for Clarkson straight up), but I think they hold out for a decent asset until they would actually have to a move. It's not like he would be overly hard to move. He's still young and on a contract that isn't terrible considering his production.


5.) 05 Jan 2018 23:52:41
Lakers will pass. Clarkson is an asset. They clearly will get more than Amir Johnson and a relatively worthless second.


6.) 06 Jan 2018 01:41:23
The Lakers aren’t going to see Clarkson as an asset in July when they’re trying to sign 2 Max free agents and Clarkson’s salary is holding that back.


7.) 06 Jan 2018 09:45:53
Can't see the Lakers doing that. They advertised wanting picks, and are willing to wait just before draft, after the season. Definitely want a first for Clarkson. Especially if they have to pay A. Johnson the rest of the season. I like Bayless, he isn't super expensive or anything, why do PHI fans despise him?


8.) 06 Jan 2018 13:28:11
Angels, I just don't think they have to do it now. We've seen teams make these kind of signings and move players once they get a commitment from someone. I think they're trying to trade him now while they still have some leverage and can get something out of him. I think he has some real value and if it were only a 2nd and an expiring contract/ capspace that was needed to get him, he would already be gone.


9.) 06 Jan 2018 13:30:49
Jorgawood: watching Bayless attempt to play defense is painful. He makes Oakfor look like Bill Russell. And I don't think Lakers get a first for clarkson. How many teams have expiring contracts, cap space for clarkson, a willingness to use that cap on clarkson? Most teams with late first round picks are already cap strapped. And I don't see any of the teams under the cap willing to give up a high to mid first for clarkson If you look at all the variables, the market for clarkson is small.


10.) 06 Jan 2018 15:21:14
Clarkson has a good contract, and Kuzma, Nance, and Randle at PF as of now. Randle for Amir would work, but why? Salaries don't match either of course. Can't see the rush, or need to trade for a guy they more than likely aren't going to keep, or need. The Lakers said they really didn't have plans on trading Clarkson until seasons end because they have had good offers for him, and are confident they can shed his salary in a flash if needed. Clarkson in a sign-and trade is a good piece too. Not sure of his exact value, but I don't think a late 1st, whether future, or this season is out of the question. Depends on what players would be involved if any. Traded Russell, and Mozgov for Lopez, and Kuzma.


11.) 06 Jan 2018 18:04:00
Jorgawood : the Russell and mozgov for Lopez and pick 27 ( great selection on kuzma ) was a steal of the year deal. They all don't and won't be that lopsided. Almost any trade compared to that one looks bad. I see your point, but I just hear too many rumors of Lakers trying to dump salary (ie clarkson, randle, and of course deng) at the trade deadline.


12.) 06 Jan 2018 19:28:02
Kuzma was luckier than your last 100, bet on 00 on a roulette wheel. True. I think if they could package him to rid themselves of Deng you will see a deadline move. Even throw in a pick. Making moves with Clarkson alone, and not getting an asset, just to shed salary before the deadline almost guarantee's their pick 2-5 goes to BOS. I think everyone knows that's got to be on the Lakers minds. Building up BOS with L. A. Assets is a real stinger for L. A. It's personal. Ainge/ Magic Still a little competitive I'd guess. Oh yeah, Bayless is terrible on D. For sure.


13.) 06 Jan 2018 20:01:11
Or. if Lakers pick conveys at #1, they don't help the celtics at all. Sixers keep it. Currently we are about halfway through the regular season, and the Lakers lead the NBA in losses. If they unload more marginal talent at the deadline to clear up cap for next year, that will help them keep that lofty loss distinction. I'm all in.


14.) 06 Jan 2018 20:10:38
Jorgawood : Do yourself a favor and watch the Danny Ainge Sedale Threatt clip on youtube.


15.) 06 Jan 2018 21:47:58
I apologize. Atlanta has 1 more loss then Lakers. I just became a hawks fan.


16.) 16 Jan 2018 03:02:56
Absolutely no to wasting max cap space on Jordan freaking Clarkson.


 

 

 

Jvoug1's talk posts with other poster's replies to Jvoug1's talk posts

 

20 Jun 2017 01:00:57
Just caught the final details on the sixers/celtics trade. realized that if the lakers pick is #1, or #6-30, sixers keep it. What i didn't know was that the 2019 kings pick has some protection as well. If the pick is the first overall pick, sixers keep it and biston gets the sixers 2019 pick wherever it falls. Trade looks even better for the sixers. But I still think it good for both teams.

Jvoug1

1.) 20 Jun 2017 16:38:15
I don't think its that great of a trade for the Celtics. Just look back at other trades where teams trade the number 1 pick for future picks. The Magic got the #3 pick that year as well as 3 other future picks. The Celtics are getting the #3 pick this year and a pick in the future that can't be #1. not good value in my eyes. Definitely would have preferred having Fultz on our team rather then playing him 4 times a year for the next 10+ years.


2.) 20 Jun 2017 16:38:15
I don't think its that great of a trade for the Celtics. Just look back at other trades where teams trade the number 1 pick for future picks. The Magic got the #3 pick that year as well as 3 other future picks. The Celtics are getting the #3 pick this year and a pick in the future that can't be #1. not good value in my eyes. Definitely would have preferred having Fultz on our team rather then playing him 4 times a year for the next 10+ years.


 

 

06 Jun 2017 22:44:46
1. 76ers/Pistons

Sixers get:Stanley Johnson
Pistons get: Okafor, Anderson, #50

Two very young players where a change of scenery may help both. Plus detroit could use some interior scoring off the bench. Philly could use some perimeter defense off the bench.

2. 76ers/Kings

Sixers get:#5 pick, Labissiere
Kings get: #3, #39

Kings secure there man in Fox at #3. Get #39 as well. Sixers get best fit in Monk at #5, get Labissiere to pair with Saric at pf.

3. Take pg Frank Jackson at #36, pg Frank Mason at #46.

4. Sign Redick, 2yrs $39 mill.
5. Sign Patterson, 2yrs $18 mill.
6. Bring over wing Furkan Korkmaz
7. Cut dead weight Henderson,Long, Rodriguez,splitter,stauskas.

C: Embiid,Holmes,Labissiere
Pf:Labissiere,Saric,Patterson
Sf:Covington,Johnson,Luwawa-cab
Sg:Redick,Monk,Bayless,Korkmaz
Pg:Simmons,McConnell,Jackson/Mason

Still keep lakers unprotected #1 in 2018 and Kings unprotected #1 in 2019. Vet presence of Redick and Patterson in the rotation should help.
Am I close on most of this? Far off on some??

Jvoug1

 

 

28 Apr 2017 18:23:50
76ers/knicks

Sixers get: Melo
Knicks get: Okafor.

Straight up deal. Sixers are only one of a handful of teams that can absorb melos 55 million over the next 2 years. Knicks get a 21 year old center who can score and fits nicely into the triangle offense. Knicks also free up a ton of money to improve team in other areas of need. Melo is 1 hour from where he grew up and not far from NY. Leaves with a ring in 2019.

Pg: Simmons
Sg: Monk
Sf: Covington
Pf: Melo
C: Embiid

Jvoug1

1.) 29 Apr 2017 15:31:35
Here's the issue with this. Okafor is awful. Zero defense. Thef be likely 4th on the depth chart. And really just a bad player. Knicks want, and will get, some value for melo. This certainly isn't that value.


2.) 29 Apr 2017 15:49:00
Hamburger. I see your point. I guess i'm not as down on Okafor (certainly don't view him as a potential star any more, but a kid with skills none the less) as some are. And i have read that Jackson likes Okafor to a degree. Okafor is just 21. Should be a junior in college. I think he still has some upside. But i also can see knicks fans wanting more value for melo. You want 3 or 4 of your second rounders back over the next 5 years?


3.) 01 May 2017 22:03:57
lol. hell get traded to the clippers, celts or cavs. depending on playoffs.

my guess is s&t for griffen. just seems right.


 

 

12 Apr 2017 22:52:54
76ers/Blazers

Portland is on the books for over 137 million in guranteed salary next year. Over 12 million more then the second highest paid team. Absoluyely zero flexibility with all that $$ tied up. Sixers have a better thrn 50% chance to land the Makers pick at either 4 or 5. I suggest a trade that may help both teams.

Sixers get:McCollum
Blazers get: top 5 pick, stauskas.

Sixers get combo guard that would pair up next to Simmons nicely. McCollum is a top scorer and a 42% 3pt shooter. Exactly what philly needs. Blazers get a top pick in a loaded draft. Can draft a stud wing and save 20 million. I think there could be other small parts to sweeten the deal for portland, but I think shedding McCollums 24 million salary, at a position they are stacked at, could workin rheir favor. A Tatum or Issac next to Lilliard and Nurkic could be nice.

Jvoug1

1.) 14 Apr 2017 08:38:05
Not awful for Portland but I think dealing McCollum for a rookie would set them back when they have good momentum after Nurkic trade and are already relatively young. If they are that afraid of luxury tax I think they could easily use some of their 3 first rounders (they have #15, #19 and #25) in this draft to get a bad team like Nets or Kings to take on some of their bad contracts.

Not sure how reasonable it is but I really liked a trade I saw someone post on this website where Portland gave up McCollum, Crabbe, Leonard and their 3 first rounders to the Bulls for Butler. This trade would get Portland out of the luxury and give them one of best backcourts in the league with Lillard and Butler who's defensive ability would add another dimension to that team.

Bulls would benefit from getting McCollum who is young enough to build around, has the skills to play pg and would likely improve as a #1 option. They'd also get 3 first rounders to add to their own (likely package some of them to move up) and although Crabbe and Leonard have bad contracts both are relatively young and would likely earn solid minutes on that Bulls team.

McCollum would be a perfect fit for 76ers as a proven scoring threat that is locked up long term but still young enough to grow with that team. I think he is the type of player they'd hope Monk would develop into and likely who they'd take if they got Lakers pick.


 

 

17 Mar 2017 19:43:27
76er moves

1. Sign Blake Griffin to max deal. Griffin raves about the sixers energy and never give up play. Has great respect for brett brown. Him and Embiid would be a great duo.
2. Sign JJ Redick to 2 year, 45 million deal. I think Gtiffin and redick are both leaving the clips, bring them both to philly. Redick serves an immediate need as a shooter and respected vet. He is also an underrated defender.
3. Draft Malik Monk. Monk should be available if the sixers pick in the 4-6 range. Kids only 19, a year or two learning from redick could do wonders.
4. Let Korkmaz develop one more year on europe. he's only 19.
5. Let go stauskas, rodriguez, henderson, long.

There has to he a mix of vets and kids on a roster. The $$ it will take to sign reddick and griffin will not effect the ability to sign Embiid, Simmons, or Saric to future deals. And we still have lakers unprotected #1 next year and kings unprotected #1 the following year.

Pg:Simmons,Bayless,McConnell
Sg:Redick,Monk,Luwawa-Cabarrot
Sf:Covington,Saric,Anderson
Pf:Griffin,Saric,Holmes
C: Embiid,Okafor,Splitter

This roster has mamy different possibilities and seems to be able to hold up if inkjuries occurr to any position.

Jvoug1

1.) 17 Mar 2017 20:58:34
With the one remaining roster spot, possibly sixers are able to trade a couple eraly seconds for a late first to a salary cap strapped team. Maybe to portland for the #27 pick. Hopefully pick up a potential decent player that falls on draft night.


2.) 18 Mar 2017 16:12:00
Griffin is probably not leaving, especially to go to the lowly 76ers. Redick is most likely not leaving either unless another team were to offer substantially more money than the Clippers, and I still don’t think he would go to the 76ers either.


3.) 19 Mar 2017 04:48:41
Rumor has it Paul and Griffin deals are already set they just have to wait until this offseason to sign them however I'd like to see things shake up and don't think the Clippers team the way its currently built will ever achieve anything significant.

76ers are certainly an exciting team and if they got someone the caliber of Griffin would be a playoff team and with their youth and the "unknown" factor who knows how their season would end up. Not certain Griffin is the best fit but he isn't necessarily a bad one either. However, with the injuries that have plagued Embiid and Simmons being a complete unknown at this point I don't see Philly as a realistic spot for a player of Griffin's caliber to go unless Philly moves some of its future picks to add some more win-now type talent. "Trust the process" isn't the motto of a win-now team so culture needs to change before they can attract top talent.

I think Sixers could potentially get Reddick due to how much cap space they have but I think I much rather give Monk the minutes, reps and shots in the NBA and bring in a veteran past his useful life that would be cheaper and not require as much minutes to mentor him.


4.) 19 Mar 2017 19:41:32
Yo tombrady: the "lowly" sixers just kicked the boyz in green ass's back to beantown. Oh wait, sixers are playing for nothing and boston trying to be the top seed in the east? I know, I know. no IT today. But what about all those allstar guards douchebag danny has drafted. Brown, Smart, bradely, rozier. Thought they might pick up the slack a bit. Oh yeah, sixers without their two best players, Embiid and Simmons.


5.) 20 Mar 2017 16:25:44
Celtics: 44-26
76ers: 26-43

Celtics also have the Nets pick which has better odds than your pick right now.

Congrats on the one win though! Would you like a ring? We have 17.


6.) 20 Mar 2017 17:04:11
Just a reply to your " lowly sixers" comment. Could have just left it alone, but you had to take that cheap dig. And i'm not comparing the history of the franchises, and bostons rebuild started with a lot more positives on their plate then the sixers. Go deflate a football.


7.) 21 Mar 2017 18:54:26
HAHAH, did you really just try, as a philadelphia fan and presumably an eagles fan, to mock the patriots? Go deflate a football? As if that's an insult. I believe the rebut is 5 super bowl championships with Brady, to zero. ever. Fly eagles. well, not really. They always suck.


8.) 22 Mar 2017 00:01:53
Actually not an ragles fan at all. Steelers since mid 70s.


9.) 22 Mar 2017 00:07:36
And i actually have a ton of respect for tom brady the quarterback and the pats organization. The greatest ever imo. Just frustrated. I just let the little" lowly sixers" jab get under my skin. But back to my original post, i think jj redick has a chance to come to philly if we overpay a bit.


 

 

 

Jvoug1's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

24 Apr 2018 15:23:05
sixers want to move bayless in a deal to clear his 9 million, not take hardaways 15 million back. doesn't make any sense for Philly. Sixers want enough cap to sign a max FA and resign some of their own role players, Hardaway and his contract is the last thing they would go after.

Jvoug1

 

 

Click To View This Thread

24 Apr 2018 13:11:27
ok? So hardaway on an unfavorable longterm contract gets you last years first round pick and another #1 pick this year? / Pacers never would consider this.

Jvoug1

 

 

Click To View This Thread

23 Apr 2018 17:15:41
How is Miami getting 2 first round picks for adebayo?

Jvoug1

 

 

Click To View This Thread

23 Apr 2018 13:16:24
Lillard is a better scorer, Butler is a better player.

Jvoug1

 

 

Click To View This Thread

23 Apr 2018 13:11:11
The knicks would need Houdini as the gm to pull of this magic. Good luck.

Jvoug1

 

 

 

Jvoug1's talk replies