NBA Trade Rumors Member Posts


rkenne_16's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



rkenne_16's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To rkenne_16's Posts



To rkenne_16's last 5 rumours posts


To rkenne_16's last 5 talk posts


To rkenne_16's last 5 rumour replies


To rkenne_16's last 5 talk replies


rkenne_16's rumours posts with other poster's replies to rkenne_16's rumours posts


27 Jul 2020 00:16:06
The Cavs get Simmons

The 76ers get Beal

The Wizards get Garland, Osman, Nance, the Cavs 20 and 22 1sts and the Bucks 2021 1st.


1.) 27 Jul 2020 08:19:42
I think Washington rather has Simmons than the picks.

2.) 27 Jul 2020 11:07:37
Possibly, but maybe, they think that Wall and Simmons are a bad fit, they’re cap is screwed with Wall there, they don’t have the young pieces that they need yet and given it’s a new front office, they’d rather get to rebuild than keep expectations.

3.) 28 Jul 2020 16:53:26
Eliminate Simmons
Beal to Cavs for Sexton, Osman, Exum swap of 20 firsts assuming Cavs higher than Wizards after lottery, Wizards get higher of Cavs / Bucks in 22.



26 Jul 2020 13:52:05
Orlando gets Levert, Dinwiddie, and Thomas

Brooklyn gets Gordon, Aminu, Ross, Orlando's 2020 and Orlando's 22 (22 top 10 protected) 1sts


1.) 26 Jul 2020 18:27:29
I think Nets will only trade these players in a package for a star. Gordon is not a star.

2.) 26 Jul 2020 18:38:53
Swap kurucs for thomas and I think it’s a great deal.

3.) 26 Jul 2020 19:07:39
Agree with fredman, but two frist 's is tempting.

4.) 26 Jul 2020 19:25:32
@Gasupo. Which can actually be seen as how little trade value Gordon has by himself.

5.) 26 Jul 2020 22:46:48
No way Dinwiddie and LeVert get two firsts and two potential starters, plus a role player. Gordon may not have too much trade value, but your overvaluing that Brooklyn package. What star are they going to get with that package? Maybe if you toss in Allen and a 1st.

6.) 27 Jul 2020 00:31:40
Big win for Orlando.

7.) 27 Jul 2020 05:36:28
being a starting nba games doesn't make you good player. orlando can only get a first round pick for gordon if pick is out of lottary. the other 2 don't have much value.

8.) 27 Jul 2020 17:10:15
Yes, but Dinwiddie and LeVert aren’t getting Orlando out of the first round of the playoffs? So why trade a starter, two rotational pieces, and two first round picks for the status quo? Better to trade away those players and bottom out. At least the picks have some possible intrigue then.



11 Jul 2020 20:28:49
2 part trade

Golden State gets Arcidiacono, Markannen, and Porter jr

The Bulls get Wiggins, the GS 2020 1s and Paschall

2nd trade

The Warriors get Young and Hutchinson

The Bulls get the Warriors 22 1st and the trade exception

Warriors line up
Markannen or Looney/Chriss

That's a championship caliber line up with some health luck

The Bulls lose Markannen but get a good first, another first and shed 20 million.


1.) 12 Jul 2020 13:44:40
I like it.



10 Jul 2020 10:00:18
The Warriors get Hayward and Robert Williams

The Celtics get Wiggins, the 2020 Warriors 1st and the Timberwolves 1st


1.) 10 Jul 2020 10:38:42
The absolute last thing Boston needs is more draft choices, and the NEXT-to-last thing the Celtics need is an underachieving Wiggins who is due $100 million over the next three years. Hayward has been a disappointment, but at least they're out from under his contract after next season (assuming he opts in for 2020-21).

2.) 10 Jul 2020 10:50:02
They’re a really young team and this sets them up to basically get anyone that comes available. If Hayward comes off, they basically just lose the money, since they’ll be over the cap any way. Not to mention that Stevens seems to can everything out of a player and has enough wings to where Wiggins has to actually earn minutes.

3.) 10 Jul 2020 11:06:55
Again, horrible for GS. They give up the top pick (or at least top couple depending on the lottery) and a likely lottery pick next year for Hayward?

4.) 10 Jul 2020 14:01:51
I think it's a good trade idea, Hayward would be a good fit and Stephins could get the best out of wiggins. but GS can get a better offer for those two picks dumping Wiggins.

5.) 10 Jul 2020 23:57:56
I would say its a good idea if Hayward didn't have so many health issues, maybe sweeten it a bit more for G.S.



04 Jul 2020 13:29:53
If Giannis were to ask out.

Bucks get Brown, Smart, Theis, Williams, Williams and 6 firsts

The Celtics get Giannis, Hill and Lopez (assuming he resigns and it's a deadline deal)

Celtics new lineup



1.) 04 Jul 2020 17:16:37
The picks are not enough and players are not enough.

2.) 04 Jul 2020 18:16:31
If the Bucks turned down that deal, then they would say no to ANY deal. Five rotation players, including three starters, plus 6 No. 1s? How much more could a team give? Doubt the Celtics would even consider that, even as good as Giannis is.

3.) 04 Jul 2020 22:07:01
Are you purposefully ignoring the fact that you get a major upgrade at center too Supercollider?

And how do they “lose 3 starters” when there’s 3 of their current starters left on the roster?

Also, can we stop talking about starters like that means something. Look around the league at the starters out there. Smart, Theis, and both Williams aren’t in the top 20 of their positions. They’re all nice role players at best.

If Boston was certain that Giannis and Lopez stay, this makes them the best team in the league by a pretty wide margin to me. The point of draft picks is the make your team the best. 6 firsts to be the best is a smart move.

4.) 05 Jul 2020 01:20:37
Collider, that’s a championship caliber team for 3+ years. You get the best player in the league and keep your two best (3 of your top 4) players. You get a top 15 center and a more than qualified replacement for smart. What more could you want out of a trade. Brown and Smart are starting caliber players. Theis is a rotation guy. The Williams are interesting young guys. Brown is really the only high end asset that they’re losing.




rkenne_16's talk posts with other poster's replies to rkenne_16's talk posts


11 Jul 2020 21:04:02
Who would you rather have, Otto Porter or Andrew Wiggins?


1.) 12 Jul 2020 03:03:13
Porter is expiring, right?

2.) 12 Jul 2020 11:43:06
My bad, I meant to say without the contracts talent into consideration.

3.) 12 Jul 2020 13:45:05

4.) 12 Jul 2020 14:17:05
Wiggins stil has the most potential.

5.) 12 Jul 2020 14:18:08
Without factoring contracts, they’re pretty much the same.

6.) 12 Jul 2020 20:37:09
Is neither an option?

7.) 12 Jul 2020 21:09:35
Wiggins he could be great with Patrick Beverley, holiday,
Green, and Embiid.

8.) 12 Jul 2020 23:38:28
Depends what you need. If you need 3&D wing, Porter. If you need a scorer, Wiggins.

9.) 13 Jul 2020 14:44:49
Porter has better fundamental of the game. He can really good on a great team wizard dumb for breaking up wall beal porter. If they were just patient in adding pf and ce.



30 Jun 2020 20:34:30
Your favorite team is in the finals. You have to give the opposing team 1 20 point scorer . It can be anyone in nba history as long as they had a semi healthy season averaging 20 points. Who do you give them and why?


1.) 30 Jun 2020 21:18:16
1988-89 Adrian Dantley.

20.3 PPG, 46% FG%, 0 3pts, 77% FT%, 5 rebounds, 2.4 AST 2.5 TOs 0.6 BLKs.

All the other team is getting is the 20 points. No real rebounding, no defense and more turnovers than assists. Numbers actually worse than Julius Randle last year.

2.) 01 Jul 2020 01:43:53
2002-03 Ricky Davis

He might ruin team's chemistry.

3.) 01 Jul 2020 15:00:45
I only looked the last 20 years, but guys that jump out at me:

Wiggins: historically inefficient, bad defender. If he were 6’2, he’s probably the clear choice.

Monte Ellis: Similarly inefficient, incredibly ball dominant, no outside shot, horrible defense.

Al Jefferson: Only good at posting up, which people don’t do anymore. He’d either be useless on offense, or require a team to totally overhaul their offense. His defense is historically bad, while playing by far the most important position on defense. Also, the teams he played on just simply seemed incapable of winning.

Rudy Gay: Every team that traded him got considerably better after. He’s been a nice role player as he’s aged, but in his prime, he weighed down franchises. Hard to put your finger on what was wrong, but it always felt like it was him.

Honorable mention: Jahlil Okafor. Came within 2 points of being the runaway winner of this. He has the worst individual season defensive rating of the last 50 years I believe, while playing the most important position. He scored, but totally broke the offense doing it. He’s like Al Jefferson, but every negative turned to 11 and none of the (limited) positives.

4.) 04 Jul 2020 10:03:03
I’d give any team I was playing against allen Iverson. He shot42% and 35% from 3. He took so many shots and iso ball he ruined team chemistry. Same with Carmelo.

5.) 04 Jul 2020 17:25:31
Iverson dragged a bad supporting cast to the Finals. He may not be efficient or be able to work with others, but he was simply great.

Now if you said Booker because of that, I might agree. He’s like Iverson, but doesn’t win.

And if you dropped Melo into a Finals team, I’d be scared that unselfish Olympics Melo would make an appearance and make you regret it.

6.) 05 Jul 2020 11:42:43
Yeah if it’s also the 2009 Melo who almost get to the finals (lost to Lakers 4-2) you could be in trouble. The offensive ability of Melo added to a finals team could be scary.



20 Jun 2020 12:02:48
Let's assume you're the gm of a good, but not great team with a combo of good win now guys and some decent prospects (think like the Blazers, but position doesn't matter). You can add one of these guys, which one would you add. Kevin Durant, Donovan Mitchell, Kyrie Irving, Jaylen Brown, or Lebron James. (Let's assume you get them for the rest of their career.


1.) 20 Jun 2020 12:34:18
I would take Lebron or Durant for sure. For the example like the Blazers

Lebron or Durant

Would definitely be one of the favorites to win.

2.) 20 Jun 2020 13:30:38
The first thing I asked myself is this: Would Boston or Utah trade Brown or Mitchell for Lebron or Durant straight up? Definately. I am not going to entertain a discuss about Kyrie.

To me its a toss up between Lebron or Durant because of age/ injury.

3.) 20 Jun 2020 13:34:59
I can’t say Durant because I can’t guarantee he’ll be the same post injury, so (as a Blazer fan) it’s Lebron. Give me 1-3 years of a top 5 all time player over 5+ years of nice all star talent.

Irving is last by a lot. Injuries and he doesn’t seem to make teams better.

4.) 21 Jun 2020 10:02:47
If it's a win now team: LBJ
If the players are under 28y: D Mitchell or J Brown.



16 Apr 2020 23:56:01
Shizzee and Drainer for Gar Forman.

Who says no?


1.) 17 Apr 2020 12:39:47
I would just shoot myself if I had to keep either.

2.) 17 Apr 2020 15:38:56
I'm not sure who made the worst trades, Shizzee or Dolan :-p.



05 Apr 2020 16:05:37
You're able to have 8 players for the rest of their career to build a team with. Which 8 are you picking?


1.) 05 Apr 2020 16:56:53
Zion, Doncic, Giannis, Siakam, Tatum, Jokic, Bam, Leonard

Put together quickly, but I think that’s the perfect balance of the young greats of the league. The oldest is 28. Most are under 25.

2.) 05 Apr 2020 17:00:14
I’d go

Doncic/ Simmons
Ingram/ Brown
Jockic/ Jaren Jackson.

3.) 05 Apr 2020 21:34:43

Morant/ Young
Doncic/ Booker
Kahwi/ Ingram
Giannis/ Siakim/ Zion
Jokic/ Bam.

4.) 06 Apr 2020 02:02:04
Young/ Morant
Kawhi/ Tatum
Davis/ Embiid.

5.) 06 Apr 2020 19:25:39
Young/ VanVleet
Giannis/ Zion
Siakam/ Tatum




rkenne_16's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

04 Aug 2020 21:55:33
How does this help the 76ers?




Click To View This Thread

02 Aug 2020 00:18:59




Click To View This Thread

01 Aug 2020 15:50:13
Why would Houston do that? Randle doesn’t give them anything that they want.




Click To View This Thread

01 Aug 2020 14:31:54
Jaren Jackson is untouchable unless the Mavs are willing yo give up Doncic or NO is willing to give up Zion.




Click To View This Thread

31 Jul 2020 19:55:34
Fredman, I blame Gentry for that. They have plenty of guys that should be plus defenders.





rkenne_16's talk replies